JackbyDev

joined 3 years ago
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Your TLDR reeeeeeealllllly buries the lede.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago

This shit is rich

I did [bad thing]. I could have done [worst thing], but I didn't.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

All of this shit falls flat when the dev themself admits they hid the feature to disable deep in the app and even called it "toxic mode". Is saying "perchance" toxic? Because that's one of their blocked phrases. Fuck no, it's not. This is just shit the personally dislike and put it in under the guise of making the fediverse more normie friendly.

As if silently hiding content with phrases like "perchance" and causing a massive drama makes the fediverse more normie friendly.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Sorry can't open paywall! Perchance perchance perchance!

Maybe it's like Candyman, if you say it five times they appear.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah like whether it's stolen or not. Whether it's a copyright violation. Oh wait.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago

Tell them then, not me. I'm not affiliated with Codeberg. I only read the change set.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If you have more specific questions about Codeberg's decision, you should ask them, not me.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Let's be real here, the concerns about what the copyright is of code that's produced by AI is still sort of in the air, especially for a site that wants to host content from across the globe. Codeberg picking its battles and not wanting to deal with that for now seems reasonable.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Such projects having an unclear copyright status (see requirements § 2 (1) 1 and § 2 (1) 3) and furthermore have little safeguards to ensure that they do not include harmful code (c.f. § 2 (1) 5).

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Did you not read the actual change?

  1. You must not share projects that mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools (including services such as Claude, OpenAI Codex). Such projects having an unclear copyright status (see requirements § 2 (1) 1 and § 2 (1) 3) and furthermore have little safeguards to ensure that they do not include harmful code (c.f. § 2 (1) 5).
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev -1 points 1 month ago

...by not posting a meme as a response? What? That doesn't even make sense.

view more: ‹ prev next ›