If you can confirm it, it doesn't matter what percentage is correct.
When solving computer problems, using an LLM to guide you to the correct answer doesn't even need 95% accuracy. Every step it gives you have to execute manually, so if something is hallucinated you will notice really quickly. And if by the end your problem is solved, then all the hallucinations didn't matter.
It only proves evil intent of those specific politicians trying to push it through.
It doesn't prove any evil intent from anything else in the EU.
The EU is a democracy. Which means that we sometimes also let evil people talk.
Malfunctioning water kettles are like one of the biggest causes of houses burning down.
Those not being repairable is a good thing. Because it would only cause more houses to burn down when everyone with a screwdriver can mess up the wiring.
There is a lot of anti-EU propaganda, especially surrounding the Chat Control.
Yes, there are some authoritarian politicians trying to push it through. But there is a reason why it has failed so many times. Because most EU politicians are really not that bad.
The propaganda is being pushed by Russia to sow discontent in the EU. That is why you see on every positive EU story, there is someone in the comment going "What about Chat Control though?" As if that proves the EU is evil.
A world where there is right to repair.
Was it posted on a instance that allows AI?
Don't speak for the lot of us.
I want to go back to websites that were actually just functional websites that did the thing they were designed to do and nothing more.
The language that is chosen in the top level domain of the URL.
If it is a domain.es it is in Spanish.
If it is a domain.co.uk it is in English.
If it is a domain.it it is in Italian.
Or just the main language where the website is located. It isn't difficult to add a language icon somewhere at the top or bottom.
Nothing about it needs to track the user. The only info you give them is that you can speak a certain language. Not that it is your main language. Or that you can only understand one.
I was talking about the shareholders.
If they blame the CEO, they can just fire them and pay a fine.
If the fault is on a shareholder, they can't be fired and will be completely to blame, so they might go to prison.
Sorry guys.
It might sound like a dream, but these replacements aren't happening as long as the shareholders can't blame the AI when the company does something bad. They don't want to end up in prison.
Modern EVs require more of a 30 minute fuel stop.
3 hours hasn't been a thing since before 2020.
Or that he is such a loser, he has to pretend like his skin colour is something important.