FishFace

joined 10 months ago
[–] FishFace@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago

"æ" was used in Old English to write the exact sound that "a" represents in most Americans' pronunciation of the word "cat", with "a" representing a distinct vowel. Old English had a few other fun letters - a bunch of people have heard of "þ" (thorn) but there was also "ƿ" (wynn) which had a sound value like "w" in modern English.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago

I would say there are not enough letters. We have about 12-14 vowel monopthongs, but only 6 letters to represent vowels. No wonder everything's a fucking mess! And that's without even getting to diphthongs.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

In contrast, languages like German and the Scandinavian languages treat accented vowels as distinct vowels of their own, moving them to the end of the alphabet in the dictionary.

In German, the umlaut is analysed alphabetically as a digraph of the base vowel plus "e", which is its ultimate source. The symbol became a diacritic mark through reduction of an "e" written above the vowel. I believe you're correct about Scandinavian languages though.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

That's the section symbol.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social -1 points 1 month ago

The first person I looked up had an extremely inflammatory slogan as their cover picture. The sentiment was anti-israel, so I expect most people here, including myself, at least broadly (possibly wholeheartedly) agree with his general stance, but I think such slogans are wrong and unhelpful so... yeah.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 19 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I think most of the people on the blocklist are not people I want to talk to. But you can fuck off if you're going to put that shit in a public client. Let people manage what they want to see by themselves.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

Most meat-eaters are content for animals to be raided and killed in order to eat them, so focusing on ecology doesn't require you to convince someone that animals have a moral value similar to that of human beings, which is a tall order.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 0 points 1 month ago

That is light-on-dark, but the sign in the pic is dark-on-light. I guess this must have been what the artist intended

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The picture doesn't depict anything that looks particularly walkable

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 16 points 1 month ago (20 children)

That sign looks like it says "no cycling"?

view more: ‹ prev next ›