FinishingDutch

joined 2 years ago
[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This shit reminds me of that helicopter gunner scene in Full Metal Jacket:

“Everyone who doesn’t show their face is an AI. Everyone who does show their face is a well-disciplined AI.”

Problem is that most people and automated systems are downright terrible at figuring out what’s actually AI. Even AI itself can’t always tell if it’s AI.

I’ve had people accuse my posts on social media as AI, just because I can write more than two sentences without spelling errors. Since they can’t, they think nobody can…

So now I tend to leave the occasional delibarete spelling mistake just so people don’t think this was written by ChatGPT. Unless I put that in my prompt, obviously 😂

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

YouTube’s bullshit is having some interesting effects for sure. Have you noticed how more and more channels are now including short clips of them doing the actual voiceover? It’s usually not even that long, like a second or two or sometimes even less. But apparently that’s now needed to prove that there’s an actual human behind the channel.

I do find it a bit distracting, but I’d rather not lose those channels either…

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yup. And replaced with utter shitheads who toed the line. I stopped visiting a lot of great subs after that.

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

In the wake of the Luigi Mangione shooting, bans went into overdrive. Even using the name Luigi in any context could get you banned. I’ve seen people get their account nuked for posting Luigi’s Mansion gameplay footage.

That place is an utter clown show at the best of times.

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

Reddit did everything in its power to get rid of the users that made the platform what it is. Or rather, what it once was. It’s barely a shell of the former glory days.

And if you get rid of your power users who make good content and good comments, well, this is what happens.

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Everyone can, there’s no legal issues with it. Same as wheelchairs. You can buy and use one if you like. Of course, people will be weirded out if you do it, but there’s absolutely nothing illegal about it.

That said, I’ve never needed a cane even though I’ve been trained to use a ‘recognition cane’ to cross the street (I went to a school for the visually impaired, where they teach everyone how to do that).

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Yep. That’s the sort of thing that interested me as a visually impaired guy (I see about 20 percent with my contacts). It’s a shame I can’t really buy and use them for that since I’d likely get physically assaulted for using them for benign purposes.

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Yeah we remember. Because that’s a literal fucking warcrime. You’re not allowed to destroy historical sites.

While I agree that destroying books is bad - even common ones - it’s also not technically illegal. If I want to burn a first edition of whatever book worth thousands of dollars… I’m legally allowed to do that.

I can also see the benefit of having a digital version of a rare book that can be enjoyed by thousands as opposed to sitting on a shelf. But yeah, definitely hold companies accountable for destroying them. There has to be a better way to do that work and still have a useable book afterwards.

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Good god, people were actually believing in that stock? Fucking idiots. 😂

That’s a meme stock, or something you buy a single share of just to say you have it. That wasn’t ever going make you rich, certainly not in the short run.

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (24 children)

Absolutely. There’s way too many blithering idiots online. We made the web way too accessible to them back in the ‘90’s.

And if idiots don’t get challenged, you run the risk of them thinking they’re actually right. And that’s very, very dangerous.

I will admit the only reason I attempt to verbally correct them is because I don’t have access to a Reaper drone to shove a Flying Ginsu missile up their ass.

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah. If anything, admitting that you’re an avid reader will have people saying “You think you’re better than me because you read?” Or some other dismissive comment regarding people who enjoy books.

So I’ve personally chosen to absolutely agree to that question: people who read are better than people who don’t.

And it doesn’t even need to be boring books. Yes, I will even count comic readers amongst our reading brethren. Anyone who reads with actual intent is alright in my book 😉

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I honestly don’t think I’ve ever heard someone here in Europe say they used a OnePlus device. Our entire company is all iPhone or some flavor of Samsung.

I don’t imagine they were much of a player here in Europe, just looking at my own circle of friends, family and colleagues.

view more: next ›