You can't even name one, you just link to a bad researched video.
How do you know there isn't an ice age in 100.000 years that completly changes the geological structure at those chosen points?
How do you know their copper tanks will last as long as calculated?
It is a silly long time you want to store highly radioactive material and you have to garantee that it won't touch any water sources. That is impossible to proove - everything else is wishfull thinking or targeted propaganda.
Please name just one long term storage for highly radioactive waste. While you will fail at that, a second task: try to imagine a facility, that is able to store something safely for 1 Million years. If you can, you are not trying hard enough.
No, it can't.
Except there aren't any long term storage solutions for highly radioactive waste.
I am not sure if I get your point. Sound so deep, that humans can't here it, is below 20 Hz. So beeing huge helps to produce such low frequencies - bigger wind turbines produce more intense infrasound than smaller ones. Infrasound is also produced by wind blowing over the landscape and by waves on the beach.
The same argument is used by opponents of wind energy - Infrasound is having bad effects on their health. People do say that while living next to roads that are producing infrasound multiple times louder than wind turbines ever could.
It's a nice argument if you need it.
Oh wow. That is next level. If someone builds a sauna out of fuel rods, do yourself a favour and don't go in there.