no, because their ad blocker is still working
Aatube
Gadget Review almost certainly uses LLMs to generate their articles.
(dear mods: this is what i meant to put as the report reason before clicking the wrong button, sorry)
that's why the law shouldn't apply to just generation. as long as something is delivered (even if over the internet) to EU places, then the EU law mandating AI labels applies.
that iirc lasted just some dozen minutes after initially being listed. that day it closed at $160. it's the closing price that matters
and even if we compare against that, that's just <42% off.
70% off
doesn’t seem to be true? lowest recently was 132.15 which is less than 23% off the peak of 170.86. and that wasn’t even a closing price; by the day’s end it was back above 135 and the stock has never closed below 135.
Link: “Like guarantees of future returns, this page doesn’t exist.”
this article sounds like AI too, i am going crazy
(the colors are whether and how much the stock rose, not credit rating)
yahoo news is not a news source but a site that republishes articles from other websites. you can tell from the top here that this is the exactly same article from Gadget Review
apparently the 404media part is just a part of the article where it cites previous incidents. so then we don’t even have a source for the meat of the article save a random X thread.
that’s not a summary; that’s the first paragraphs of the article
(CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0, the non–open-source part here being NC)

yeah, my point is that was never the concern of such people