01189998819991197253

Functionally, though, wouldn't it be the same as replacing the computer's SecureBoot bootloader, since it's Microsoft (in the case of SecureBoot) that doesn't like the unofficial key that Linux installs? Shouldn't the user be allowed to add or remove any key they desire from the allow list of official keys (maybe have some sort of decentralized verification system, if they user decides they want to verify it)?

I'm more thinking out loud here, trying to understand.

I'm assuming this is why it will forever "warn" me that my phone is running an "insecure" OS?

I don't know but...

Well, it hadn't all yet been produced, so no fire sale.

Oh no. Anyway.

That's the best everybody gets one vibe I've seen in a long time, and I dig it hahaha

Not sure who downvoted you, but at least votes mean nothing on Lemmy.

Anyway. I think I found something on the topic, if you're interested

I've never heard that before. Do you have source/s so we can learn more about this?

Edit. Autocorrect

And, I believe, those models have TPUs.

Adb won't work to disable/remove ADV?

I think they're a great idea. They don't use land, don't continuously use water, and don't pollute our land and waterways. And, as an added bonus, they're extremely expensive and a money-pit.

I'm actually OK with this enshittification, and hope it continues into oblivion on the Facebook spyglasses. Personally