this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2026
130 points (88.2% liked)

Technology

87627 readers
4137 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago
[–] Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

He could by getting all conservatives out of policy making positions, but he is too much of a bitch to do it.

[–] Blackdoomax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

New golden shower*

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

By golden age they mean something cheap with gold spray paint.

[–] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

He won't. But he totally can

[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I guess pseudoscience is a kind of a science

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

it does use "sciency" stuff, but often its outdated, or misinterpretated, like invermectins effect on covid, which was treating the parasitic infection that was hampering the immune system rather than the covid itself,.

[–] AlexNorris@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

The golden age of "who knows what's happening"

[–] leanleft@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago

the article seems pretty partisan and populist. selectively chooses facts for discredit while omitting any admission of credibility. does not address the problems or issues with a proposed solution. lots of suspicion, unfair assumptions about motives, and irrelevantly keeps tieing back to the trump administration. the highly partisan angle seems to discredit arstechnica as an intelligent unpreferential information source for productive discussion.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›