this post was submitted on 31 May 2026
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

87417 readers
3842 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

time to start the 12 year countdown to ever seeing it in a single consumer product

[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah until it starts hitting widespread hardware decode support (streaming devices and phones) it’s pretty much just a curiosity to all involved as the only things traditionally powerful enough to software decode these codecs at 4k without overheating are computers and I don’t see that changing.

If h266 gets hw decode support on a bunch of common chips first it’ll be a real blow licensing freedom or not.

[–] Glitchvid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's a different world, there isn't much driving VVC like there was for AVC and HEVC. There isn't a new physical media format, and even the latest OTA TV specification is stuck on HEVC.

It's going to be up to streaming platforms what wins the next codec race, and a lot of them are betting on AV1 and AV2 for obvious reasons. I don't see VVC really getting widespread adoption.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, my very first thought was “oh great, another new codec for my server hardware and devices to not support.”

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone -1 points 2 months ago

if we're going to have more of them they really need to get faster at supporting these things

[–] Mio@feddit.nu 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How much better is it? I am thinking in terms of compression.

[–] ZephyrXero@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

I'm seeing reports of a 20-30% improvement in bitrate usage. But the encoders are also still early at this point