this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
93 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

87417 readers
3720 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Spoiler:"Is it good?

No."

I use Kagi but do agree with the three listed complaints about it. Overall happy with it, but would consider something like uruky if it was a high quality search. I welcome the competition and there's plenty more room since the big boys keep getting worse.

My workplace actually blocks the uruky site.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I accidentally went to Google for the first time in months and was wtf'ing over how many results are sponsored.

The complaints about Kagi are valid, mostly, (there's always that one guy that runs around complaining that Kagi uses Yandex). But damn I've gotten spoiled by the results and the ranking customization...

[–] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 1 points 1 month ago

yandex and brave*

[–] ComradePenguin@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

I am one of the people previously complaining about it. I decided to rethink it and changed my mind. It is not a big enough deal to avoid the service. I tried it for a couple of months, and was satisfied with the results.

I really liked filtering results and boosting them.

In the end I deciding it was not good enough to justify the price, so I ended up with Qwant as my daily driver going forward.

[–] RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I tried searching for a random YouTuber, the fourth page was for images of their feet, 10/10 search engine

[–] smileyhead@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Would give lower score, as this should definetly be on the first page

[–] MolochHorridus@piefed.social 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You really can’t even test the damn thing without paying? Good luck, Uruky.

[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can. There's a search box on the home page and everything.

[–] neshura@bookwyr.me 2 points 1 month ago

If you create an account it is "preloaded" with one day for free

[–] neshura@bookwyr.me 6 points 1 month ago

I'll try it out for a month, see how the results "feel" compared to Kagi (I fully agree with the points against Kagi mentioned in the article, especially on the focus they seem completely lost recently). So long as I sort of find what I need I'll probably move over, if only because it's supporting a European business.

[–] ComradePenguin@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I like the initiative, but this is ridiculously bad. I searched for one of the biggest tech youtube channels:

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why not search for youtube channels on youtube instead?

[–] ComradePenguin@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

If the purpose of finding content online is the purpose of a search engine, then it does not do a good enough job.

[–] yessikg@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But why use this when Qwant is free

[–] juergen@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

operating a search engine is expensive. ecosia finances their stuff with ads. qwant probably too? if uruky comes out big, being independently financed means they could participate in the qwant-ecosia index without risks.

[–] Soupbreaker@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Who's vetting these names? I mean what's next, a Morgul search engine? I don't want to be an Uruk-hai :(

[–] garbage_world@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)