this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
572 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

87598 readers
4129 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TL;DR: you now need to pay a $20/month "meta premium" subscription to use a 100% offline feature that runs on your own malware-ridden smartglasses.

If you don't subscribe, you can use the feature that is already included in the hardware that you already paid for 3 hours each month

The now-paywalled feature boosts the voice of the speaker in front of you, something that even low-end ANC earphones are doing now. 5 minutes of free usage per day is basically nothing.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] socsa@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

something that even low-end ANC earphones are doing

Because God forbid you take the fucking earbuds out of your head when talking to someone.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] vocornflakes@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Meta's finances must be in the shitter to be enshittifying a premium product.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

Finding ways to make an awful product even worse.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I got a pair of meta glasses for free...

Still in the damn box. Not touching it.

load more comments (3 replies)

Good. Enshittification of the panopticon goggles.

[–] Betch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Man I can't wait to see the first rube that pays 20$ a month for me to completely dismiss their existence.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

good! why is anyone using these anyway?

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People already pay these fees for everything from heated seats in their cars to online storage because their locked down garbage mobile OSes won't let them mount remote directories directly to their file system.

People are terrible at technological freedom and worse at tolerating even minor inconveniences to secure any kind of rights. This shouldn't even be SLIGHTLY surprising to someone in 2026. We're reaching the point where someone is going to make breathable air a monthly subscription fee.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] garbage_world@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I can't wait for open source smart glasses

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] corey931@lemmy.wtf 4 points 1 month ago

people who vouched with their money for these asshole companies seriously had it coming. they are the lords of enshittification

[–] brave_lemmywinks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe they can occasionally block your view with ads to unlock this feature...

I love the idea behind this tech and it seems one of the more useful tech evolutions, but I'm aware this is a privacy nightmare...

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I see regulation coming for these things very soon. Most people hate them.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago

Yay! Another reason not to buy them!

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Fully support Meta killing this awful product.

[–] Superorbit@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

The cracks are showing. There's only so much investor money.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

That means by simply connecting them to the internet you're generating around $20/month for Meta. Now how would they do that? :)

[–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Y'all still think things are priced according to how much it costs to produce or deliver them?

Idk, if it's offline it sure seems like meta can't sell data from it so that's costing them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›