this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2026
645 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

87814 readers
3554 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What a way to launch John Crapple.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What did you expect from a Trillion dollar corporation, that gifted Trump a 24k gold and glass statue, made a $100B commitment to US manufacturing, and being among the "donors" of the White House ballroom? But changing the name of a lake? Too far...

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

made a $100B commitment to US manufacturing

Why is that bad though?

[–] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

It's Apple buying goodwill, for both itself and the Trump administration, while only marginally benefiting the average US citizen, if at all.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The “24k gold base” was likely a thin layer, but whatever, yeah they gave him ~10-100k in gold and implied unwarranted praise in exchange for points. They also committed $600 billion ($100 billion more than before trump won, thanks a lot everybody) to build manufacturing in the US, which, if someone’s mad about that - sorry.

The ballroom is worse, but this is even worse yet, yes. I don’t have to look at his participation trophy, i don’t ever expect to see the Epstein Ballroom and Bunker Boys Club built, but everyone in the world can see this idiotic “renaming”. That’s not strategic, that’s not hedging, that’s just pathetic.

[–] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

I'm not saying it isn't pathetic, but Apple has a track record of gobbling Trump's marbles for business, so it should be expected they aren't risking anything over the name of a lake in their mapping service.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I don’t think this new CEO is going to last more than a year. He has all the charisma of Gil Amelio.

At least he shelved the Apple Vision headset. Hopefully he also canned the Apple Glasses and AirPods with camera that were rumored.

[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean, why would he care? Either way he gets obscene amounts of money for at the least a lazy years worth of work

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Maybe. It’s inauspicious at best.

[–] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Most prominent CEOs want a successor that fails because it makes them look better in retrospect.

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was thinking of Gil this morning, very much reminiscent.

But wearables are like 3/4 of Apple's strategy for the future and optical is a huge part of that and the Vision Pro is just them getting started, not them bowing out. They just want others to enter the space and start making these expensive mistakes so Apple doesn't have to, including overcoming the social barrier of filming literally everything. It's coming. Just like folks didn't really resist social media, we're not going to really resist this.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It’s just Tim’s Newton. We’ll get something better in ten years, like we got the iPhone. But I don’t know that it will come from Apple unless we get someone more creative in the leadership role.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Did anybody ask AI what it thinks about the name change?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lmdnw@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

What a bunch of loose, prolapsed assholes these execs are. How do they expect to usher forth a technocratic state if they can’t even separate themselves from the stupidest under the status quo?

[–] cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

Should have used The Treaty of Canandaigua as their argument to the administration as to why they couldn't change the name.

[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But they were okay with the Gulf of Mexico being renamed?

[–] Freeposity@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›