Dozens, ya say?
From a company that has 164,000 employees?
OK. I mean, that sucks for them, but that's about it.
this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
166 points (99.4% liked)
Technology
87575 readers
3769 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
So the software engineers who worked on the failed product get laid off, but not the people who decided to make the thing and directed its development. Cool cool cool
Shit flows down, not up.
We used to say "shit rolls downhill" in the military
That’s a lot of shit if it’s rolling.
I thought the (former) VP in charge of it left for OpenAI not long ago.
This wouldn’t happen (as easily) if they had a union.
AppleInsider reported Thursday that layoffs at Apple Vision Group were anticipated because the company’s expensive VR headset was not selling well since its launch
I mean, what did they expect? People have been trying to make VR a thing since the 80s.
Really: what did they expect. Most of the companies who saw the device coming thought of it as a foot in the door more than anything else. If Apple wants to compete with others in the space it can't release a heavy version of the Quest and think it'll just work out. Meta now has the Raybans and think of them what you want, but they at least seem to sell. Apple should want to go there, VR is just a stepping stone'
My guess is that it's an excuse, not the actual reason.
Meta now has the Raybans and think of them what you want, but they at least seem to sell
Good point, maybe there is a market after all.
Yeah, but not for half a kilo strapped to your forehead. That was kinda obvious. Even Hololens balanced the weight on the head.
Exactly.
Now would be the time for Valve to pick some of them up.
They did with that one woman.
They are surprised VR isn't really taking off with inflation through the roof huh?
Every few years for over half a century, someone decides that VR is finally going to be a big thing, spends a bucketload of cash on it, only to learn the exact same lesson: VR doesn't actually solve any kind of practical problem anyone ever had, but it does create a whole bunch of new ones.
Fundamentally they believe 3D will take off. Recall the 3D tv hype?
People don’t want any of that.
The manufacturers and the marketplaces need us to buy a new thing otherwise we would just enjoy the thing that we have until the wheels fall off. TVs had to get innovative to keep fueling replacements.
CRT's still minimally existed in consumer spaces when 3D TVs were being crammed down our throats. I was grateful when the DLP versus plasma versus LCD wars were over.
But there always has to be a new product platform around the corner for businesses that are requiring endless growth will die. Consider the InstantPot as an object lesson, and then look at the absolutely ludicrous ecosystem of kitchen branded appliances that the Ninja Bullet spawned.
Those of us that bought into vr, and then bought into it again. And then again. Like it or believe in it for reasons that clearly aren't going to make us profit.
I do not anticipate any AR Revolution, after both Microsoft and Google drink deeply from that goblet and clearly lost. I don't think meta is new project in that space will be ultimately useful for anyone but perverts and con artists.
I'm increasingly skeptical of growth and Innovation for growth and Innovations sake. I kind of just want to play, now. And also I would do crimes for a refrigerator and a washing machine that was supposed to last 20+ years of continuous operation like our grandparents had.
I do want 3D, but the implementations just have too many drawbacks.
If the nearest store still has one, do a demo of it. It is quite impressive. You can see where they’re trying to get ready for whatever comes after smartphones
I don't recall any hype around it at all except that it was a thing that companies made. Most of them require glasses so I really don't understand how they thought that would ever catch on.
Before goldeneye there was no 3d Nintendo gaming.
VirtualBoy
Mario 64 was first
It does allow for some awesome games though.
You'd think, and yet all the gamers I know who own a headset has it gathering dust on the shelf.
That's because it doesn't take very long to blow through all the great games. They exist, just not that many.
Guilty as charged…
You're not wrong, and I'm included in that because I'm a dumbass who bought an Oculus Rift (i.e. not a Vive) some 6 years ago or so, and I've since gone 100% Linux. But man was it a magical upgrade for my sim racing setup. In many ways better than a triple screen setup, but occupies less space.
My headset was extremely immersive for DCS and IL-2, but I could never use the keyboard well enough with it on.
Which one? Beat saber or beat saber?
Half life Alyx. Superhot VR. Walkabout mini golf. VR boxing. Any VR flight/racing sim.
VR is more about having fun than practical solutions.
AR will bring the practical applications.
By the same token, AR is no longer new technology. Every AR app I've ever had on my phone got used a couple of times at the start, and have since been auto-offloaded from disuse. There might be some edge case stuff relating to accessibility tools, but companies like Apple weren't the ones leading research into those in the first place.
In fact now I come to think of it, the most successful AR app I'm aware of is Pokemon Go...
In fairness, though, an app on your smartphone is basically the worst form AR. It forces you to try to look at the world around you through a tiny screen, you can only interact with the app by touching that screen while keeping the camera pointed at the right thing, and you absolutely can’t use your phone for any of the other things you’d normally use it for.
Clunky headsets are better, but only good for use in private spaces and IMO if you’re only going to use the headset in one place, that seems like a better candidate for VR anyways.
IMO the best case for AR basically is a pair of glasses or contacts. Something that takes little to no effort to use and has the ability to augment any area of your vision. Unfortunately, as we’ve seen so far, assholes and perverts seem all too happy to take any device with a camera in it and ruin things for the rest of us.
It's pretty great for socializing at home, so if someome can't get out they can still have something similar avaliable. Otherwise there isn't really a killer feature.
See that's the thing, it sounds like it should be good for that, but really it doesn't facilitate any kind of social interaction you weren't able to get from your PC, and at the same time makes a bunch of other stuff more awkward.
It's pretty great for socializing at home, so if someome can't get out they can still have something similar avaliable. Otherwise there isn't really a killer feature.