this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
308 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

87575 readers
3793 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At least one Kansas district is projecting $150,000 to $180,000 just to equip secondary students with individual phone lockers, according to the Wichita Eagle. The state provided zero dedicated funding. Every dollar comes from local budgets.

Districts choosing fabric locking pouches — think Yondr, the magnetic-lock system concert venues use to keep audiences present — face an estimated $30 per unit. Statewide, the Kansas Division of the Budget put that figure at roughly $13.4 million if every student received one, according to the Lawrence KS Times. Lockers require a steeper upfront investment. Neither option came with a state check attached.

Legislators passed the policy. The price tag was someone else’s problem.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago

A thief would make more money stealing the lockers than the phones.

[–] DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Why not use existing lockers?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] THE_GR8_MIKE@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Did they really need to get each phone its own locker?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SleepyPie@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Fantastic news, I’m glad they’re proactively seeking solutions

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Our KS district is just 100% no devices and no announcement about lockers like in the article. Just an expectation that school landlines will be available when needed, and I forsee that going terribly.

[–] modem_down@thebrainbin.org 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Landlines worked fine for a century or so. Any specific reason you think they wouldn’t work today?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] wedge@multiverse.soulism.net 4 points 1 week ago

I can do it for $149k

[–] BadlyTimedLuck@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm seeing alot of comments about how this will or won't work for how much the price is, but this made me think of something else.

Don't we give kids chromebooks/devices anyway. I assume the point of these lockers is to force kids to pay attention, but chromebooks are waaaaaay worst than any phone a parent gave them.

You can threaten a kid to take their phone away, but you can almost argue you can't take the chromebook away because that's where all their assignments, tasks, books, notes, etc are all stored. And from my experience, people were always goofing off on other sites or playing games. Unless the school is able to monitor and lock down those chromebooks (which if we're being honest, have the bare minimum of parental controls), then this is just throwing money at a fire instead of, I dunno, paying teachers better to actually help kids learn instead of moderating their tiktok addictions

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›