this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

87575 readers
3743 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cherry@piefed.social 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

People hate ads full stop and tech has amplified them to be there, all the time, following you. Start buying only what you need from small businesses if possible.

Stop fawning over brands and marketing. They don't like you, they don't want a conversation, the don't care if you are a better person. They want your money. Capitalistic is a cancer...don't feed it.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I dont know. I watch less ads now woth the aid of tech. Lemmy, jellyfin etc

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, even my wife who uses standard streaming services with ads, youtube with ads, etc reminded me recently that we used to have 3 5-minute commercial breaks every half hour on broadcast tv growing up. I'm all for getting rid of ads, but it was interesting to realize that even before the internet you only got about a 50% ad-to-content ratio.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What's crazy is if you watch shows from the 60s and 70s they can have an extra 3-5 minutes of content in a 30 minute time slot.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

This is fantastic if it means companies can switch to inexpensive ads that can be cobbled together by somebody's kids, and ditch their multi-million dollar ad budgets that just make everything cost more.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

i mean sure, but it’s corporate greed that actually makes things cost more.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That is definitely a major factor, it's just not the only one. People seem to believe the world operates like a comic book with designated villains do all the bad things and everybody else is just a victim. Individual behavior is also a factor. I mean what's the dominant gospel on Boomers - that they irresponsibly polluted the Earth and wasted all the resources, or that they were innocent victims of a few evil billionaires?

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The former.

Evil billionaires are more of a 2020's thing.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Interesting - the idea that rich people weren't taking advantage of everybody else all through history until they just started uniquely victimizing the current generation seems mind-bogglingly unaware tbh.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The difference is that it used to be harder to concentrate massive wealth in the hands on one individual. It used to require very large companies, which were controlled by multiple people through shares and board positions. Companies themselves weren't allowed to grow too massive or achieve monopolies.

Lately all checks have gone out the window which has resulted in single individuals having control over mind-boggling amounts of resources. This changes the dynamics a lot because an individual will act very differently from a large board or shareholders.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Depends on what you mean by "recently". Think Rockefeller, Getty, Rothschild, Carnegie, Vanderbilt, Morgan... all the classic mega-wealthy families were built around companies with one man at the top, who made or approved all major decisions and either owned the company outright or had a dominant majority share. That didn't really change until around the 1930s. Modern corporate structure with distributed participation made it possible to get extremely wealthy without starting or inheriting your own company.