this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
210 points (93.4% liked)

Technology

87598 readers
3860 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Of course they want to make upgrading more attractive because it is less attractive now that it ever has been.

If you want people to buy new stuff, making that stuff different from the old stuff they already own would be a good idea.

[–] spaceracoon@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago

I mean lots of mobile providers have been providing phones as part of their subscription model, that has going since the 2000s.

That is not convenient at all, but some folks don't want to downplay 1000+$ and they really want an iphone or whatever.

It seems to me Apple and Samsung want to get their fair share of that (still sucks though cause its all in the "you don't own anything")

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It's time for some right-of-first-sale legislation that kills off the subscription-for-everything scam.

  1. It should be illegal for a lack of a subscription to prevent operation of something you've bought.

  2. Same goes for requiring connectivity.

  3. If the subscription service terminates, reverse-engineering to maintain continuing operations should be protected by law, and the manufacturer should be required to provide the specifications to the public.

  4. DRM to prevent access to subscribable features should be illegal.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

This is basically how my company gives us our phones. And i think it’s now our less standard

[–] Hiro8811@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Maybe, if there's a way to fake every single detail then unlock the bootloader and load another OS, that is unless the GSM module dosen't has some unique ID

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

F-them! I'm quite happy with my DeGoogled Fairphone 6.

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

"guaranteed buyback" just nerfs the used market.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Um. Isn't this what people already do? Phone comes with contract. You don't own it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›