this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

87575 readers
3777 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The targeted women included heads of state, first ladies, royalty, legislators, government officials, journalists, TV presenters, athletes, entertainers, and other public figures.

Investigators said users could browse material by tags including "rape," "forced," "degradation," and "slave." Those categories are a big reason why prosecutors framed the case as abuse and exploitation rather than a copyright or impersonation dispute.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Good. Great. Awesome.

Yet only the rich get protection, the everyday girls and women have to see their artificial nudes on X while trying to avoid their coworkers and classmates laughing about it. Two tiered justice.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You guys can all make deep fake nudes of me if you want. I'm not saying everyone should feel like me but I promise you I would not care even one little bit.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

So long as you don't use your consent as an assumption to assume others do/should consent, then sure, great, cool, whatever. Can't help but notice your lack of pictures on your account so seems more like theoretical thing as opposed to something someone could choose to do against you.

But schools are literally being blackmailed with deep faked photos of their students. I'm infinitely more concerned for those boys and girls wellbeing that a handful of famous folk with Lawyers and PR teams.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm happy to provide a picture if you think making some deep fakes would make you feel better. Also, as I said, people are allowed to be upset by whatever they choose. If deep fakes of you exist and that upsets you then feel free to rage about it all you like. I don't see the point in feeling anything more than annoyed at having to explain that the pictures are fake but, again, that's just me.

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Gonna recommend you look for reports of people who feel differently from you on this, read their stories and emotional accounts of going through this, with some empathy.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I understand the logic of it just fine. Disagreeing with the response is not a sign of a lack of empathy. I've said repeatedly that people can feel how they want. I find it ironic that those of you purporting to be open minded are the ones trying to control how others feel about this topic.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The fact you think this is only about people's feelings and not the material reality of bullying speaks volumes. Then you go onto gaslight people over your lack of awareness of the situation. Please share this encounter with your therapist or find a therapist before I start decoding your projections for the internet to see.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There it is again. "Don't act like you're right and others are wrong" doesn't work as a prescriptive when you're doing exactly that in your replies.

Why is it so important to you that I think about things the same way you do? You're tossing out every derogatory pop-psychology term you can think of in an effort to make me conform to your way of thinking and yet I'm supposed to believe that you're the empathetic one. I don't think so buddy. Get over yourself.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Im not going to bully you to prove the fact that bullying works. You do that well enough on your own.