this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
276 points (97.6% liked)
memes
22489 readers
2392 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I always schedule them the same day if I can. Waiting between interviews does no one any good. I do a 45 minute with them for a one-on-one interview. I have a few the people they'd be working with ready to do more of a technical interview for an hour or so. If things don't go well after either, I let them know, and we part ways. If they do well, I put them in the yes pile. After one week from the first yes person, I choose the one I think best. Sometimes there is just one. When there's more, I choose the best fit and let the others know.
One time, when hiring a qa, I had two people who where both great. I really hated having to tell one of them no. A month later, a qa position opened on a different team and I passed on her resume. After she was hired, I sort of poached her from the hiring manager. She still reports to them, but she works entirely on my projects. But that's an aside.
My point is, a single interview is more than sufficient to hire anyone. The multiple interview crap, that's become so common, is done solely to stress someone out so they'll take a lower salary just to stop the stress.
Edit: Grammer
Multiple interviews are also done because there's far too many people in the hiring chain who don't really need to be there. I've had interviews for lower-level managerial positions where literally the vice president or some other person who clearly has better things to do than to be there, is there just to "be involved", or (in one case) all hiring decisions had to be run through the VP. I've done panel interviews with 6 different HR people at once who clearly just need something to justify their existence.