this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2026
266 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

87469 readers
3364 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The fossil fuel (just like crude oil) was formed via natural processes, so it's accurate.

I get what you're saying though. It makes it sound happy and safe to use.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

In case you're unaware, that's literally why they took to calling it that.

Technically correct, easiest to market back when people were first starting to have doubts about setting stuff we found underground on fire.

Using the word "natural" was very much a deliberate choice.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago

The term was useful back when we used coal gas. It stopped being useful 100 years ago.

[–] randompasta@lemmy.today 5 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe say methane.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I love being in Canada and they routinely use terms like "clean natural gas". Like wut?

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

It's only clean when you compare it to the fossil fuel alternatives it replaces like coal.