this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
342 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

87649 readers
2789 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

If it's any consolation, we are nearing the point where it's legit impossible to tell and people will slowly go back to caring about the content instead.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

What does this mean? Is art not content?

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (7 children)

It means that once the comic output from AI is indistinguishable from the output of an artist, then people will stop concentrating on the tools used and go back to judging a comic on if it was funny or entertaining.

This guy draws really well but none of his comics are good. It's all trite boring pandering.

To be clear, I'm not saying hand made art has no value, just that a shit joke isn't somehow better than a good one just because of the tools used.

Good content + real art > Good content + AI > boring content + real art

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 3 points 3 weeks ago

Agreed. That's why I keep referencing the toupee fallacy: it's easy to detect AI slop because it's slop but anything well-made flies under the radar. This leads many people to assume that everything made using AI is by default not good and conversely when something is good they falsely assume a human made it. I'd argue that virtually every devout AI hater has at some point enjoyed AI content because they failed to detect it as such.

So no, not all toupees look bad - you only notice the bad ones.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)