this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2026
467 points (91.2% liked)

Technology

87515 readers
3039 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's a large list of things LLM are known to not be reliable for: searching anything beyond surface informations

This implies that it is reliable for "surface informations" which i disagree with, though a lot of people get sucked in that way

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you ask any big LLM a mundane question, it's likely to get it right. And as you put it, it's one of the way people get sucked in. But it does work, very inefficiently, for that purpose. Saying it does not is lying to yourself.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I disagree. A big LLM might get a mundane question right, but it might not. To call it reliable is laughable.

What it is is confident, and if you don't know the answer yourself, it will seem plausible.