this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
0 points (NaN% liked)
Technology
87450 readers
3309 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I have only one data point:
I am an embedded software developer. Recently, I had to attach and debug a stepper motor with a serial interface to an embedded control system. A bog standard task - basically, you need to initialize the motor, send it a home / referencing command, tell it to which position it has to go, and wait until it is there. Luckily for science, I had to do practically the same seven years ago with a lab system at a research institute. And in the current job, the senior engineer responsible for the motor interface is a heavy proponent of AI tools and uses these whenever he can.
Oh, and there are a few more pesky little differences:
In both cases, the result had to be reliable, ad it was part of expensive and heavy machinery with high cost of failures.
The outcome? The task took less than four weeks in the first job, and over six months in the second job. In the first case, the result was very reliable. In the second, it is still not fully reliable.
You can point out that the second was a legacy system, which is more difficult to evolve. But that's the point - AI does not "understand" legacy systems at all, and worse its use brings down and inhibits communication and knowledge transfer.
At best, you can conclude that AI is no substitute at all for a lack of knowledge and working institutional processes.
Thank you, this is what I have been trying to tell people, I am an IT guy at a financial services company, the entire company is currently AI pilled, and I hate it.
Replacing knowledge and skills with a statistics based chatbot is insane.
The only times I use AI is like a dynamic manual, and that is only if I couldn't find the information through a normal googling.
I have tried to use AI to write code for me, and it terrified me, it was so easy, but I lost control and understanding of the code, and I hate that.
I want to be able to glance at the code of a script I have developed and be able to remember how it works, and I don't get that with AI.
A skilled employee with knowledge of the code/system is far, far more valuable than a statistics based chatbot.