this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2026
334 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

87515 readers
2779 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 76 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

Tunick asked four times during the interrogation to speak with a lawyer, but was rebuffed each time, according to courtroom testimony. Additionally, the agents produced no warrant and did not read Tunick his rights.

If he’s not even accused of a crime, how is wiping his phone “destroying evidence”? What is the crime being committed here? You are allowed to wipe your own phone, and technically he didn’t even do that.

Furthermore, asking a suspect for their passcode is bargain basement police work. Being surprised when this doesn’t work seems pretty incompetent. I think they’re throwing the book at him because they fucked up.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 64 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

No, they're throwing the book at him to make a statement.

Their argument, which is stated in the article, is that since he was not in the US (you are not considered in the U.S. until you go through border protection, even if physically here), US rights and protections don't apply.

Similarly, this isn't destruction of evidence they are charged for. It is destruction of property to prevent seizure. Which is a bit awkward because that's a law in the US, but he isn't in the US yet....?

Of course, it's all bullshit. We all know this, but this is going to set a very dangerous precedent if it sticks.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

And being "in the US" or not doesn't have shit to do with it anyway. Yes, CBP gets some special powers at the border, like warrantless search, but whether you are before or after passport control does not determine whether or not you are subject to the laws of the US, with, again, the exception of the special powers granted CBP that do reduce some protections you would normally have.

[–] TrollTrollrolllol@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Trump appointed judge says it's A-Okay

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)