this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2026
283 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

87627 readers
4535 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 6 points 1 month ago (9 children)

The awkward part is that software has a habit of racing toward free once it becomes good enough

Has it? Jira, Teams, Slack, Google Meet, Cisco WebX... There's obviously Jitsi but I don't see companies racing towards it. When it comes to SaaS most companies prefer to pay and be done with it. Few are choosing to host open source solutions. Windows and Mac are also way more popular than Linux in office settings. With LLMs hosting it will be even more complicated because companies will have to invest heavily in GPUs.

If the bubble bursts companies will lose funds to work on new models but someone will still be able to offer existing models as a service. Companies will chose the one with better price and functionality. Being free or not will have little to do with it.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

They don’t have to host it themselves. They could use a number of providers for the same model, and basically keep doing whatever they were doing with OpenAI/Anthropic via the exact same APIs.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Of course but they would have to pay for accessing it and the company with more efficient model will offer it at lower prices and most likely win customers. Having open weights doesn't change anything here.

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Of course it does. It prevents oligopolies.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 1 month ago

I guess it could help limit the price gauging by the few companies that will have the best models but so would the ability to hire junior devs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)