this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2026
796 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

87550 readers
3003 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 203 points 1 month ago (34 children)

Couldn't happen to an uglier, more stupid car.

It looks like something a 6 year old designed on a 1980s PC.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children)

That's quite exactly what they were going for actually. Lo-res graphic to represent hi-tech. Somewhat like military camo is now pixelated for no practical reason.

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Just because you don't know why digital camouflage exists doesn't mean it has no practical purpose.

[–] Klear@piefed.world 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Neither pixellation nor digitization contributes to the camouflaging effect. The pixellated style, however, simplifies design and eases printing on fabric, compared to traditional patterns. While digital patterns are becoming widespread, critics maintain that the pixellated look is a question of fashion rather than function.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Simplified design and easier printing sounds like a very practical purpose.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At the cost of drip? Very much not worth.

[–] Yttra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Drip or drown, baby 😎

[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

That paragraph seems to contradict itself. "ease of printing" is a functional concern, even if it doesn't affect the camo while in use.

[–] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Very interesting, but after reading, it specifically states that it's the multi scaling that has a function on the battlefield, which can be implemented through all shapes basically.

The 'digital' (square) patterning is most certainly either cost saving measures, fashion, or both.

"The pixellated style, however, simplifies design and eases printing on fabric, compared to traditional patterns. While digital patterns are becoming widespread, critics maintain that the pixellated look is a question of fashion rather than function.[7]"

Now I'm aware you just stated that 'it had a practical purpose' but your tone and framing suggests to me something other than 'its easier and cheaper to manufacture'.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

nah, you're totally off topic. I was responding to looks. sorry for distracting you away from looks by mentioning practicality. on practicality, the reason for the cybertruck panels is they're stainless steel. on looks, you didn't reply. since you avoided that topic, i suspect you're another sheep who jumped on the "ugly" bandwagon and aren't able to say much more than "ugly ugly ugly". no interest.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)