this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
231 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

87469 readers
3149 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eicker@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Paying a ransom doesn’t buy trust: It buys hope from people who have already proven they’re willing to extort you! If criminals learn that victims pay, asking for a second ransom isn’t a betrayal of the deal. It’s just the next logical business decision. 🤷

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

"It's not X it's Y" LLM slop BS.

Comment history is full of similar chatgpt slop.

Edit: go ahead and downvote me all you want but mark my words - in 1 to 3 months this account is going to switch to shilling the online marketing strategy consulting website it's already heavily advertising in its profile. The website is literally promoting marketing bots pretending to be real people to sell you stuff.

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 9 points 1 month ago

Or increasing the ransom...If they'll give me a million, they'll give me 2.

[–] freely1333@reddthat.com 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

FWIW I had to pay the ransom once and it worked fine they gave the password over and even bargained the price down and also fucked up because crypto fees so didn’t have the ability to send the actual full amount and they were chill.

Minus the whole being held for ransom they were probably more consumer friendly than the average large corporation.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Their income is based on trust: that their target trusts them to keep their end of the bargain when paid. Without that trust, there's no reason to pay them or engage at all other than to try to trap them.

[–] eicker@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago
[–] cantankerous_cashew@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

The hackers might as well start charging a monthly recurring subscription