this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2026
72 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

87598 readers
4012 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Just fuck all the way off with this shit. I know this is Australia, but in the US many states are requiring ID verification for most mainstream porn sites. Sure there are others that work, but it shouldn't even be a thing in the first place.

[–] Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I wonder if someone can start a lawsuit by stating ID are a direct constitutional violation to view porn, as it's protected speech.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

???

Porn is protected speech?

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In America, although I'm sure that's on the Republican shit-can list.

[–] Zagorath@quokk.au 3 points 1 month ago

although I’m sure that’s on the Republican shit-can list

Well even back in 2004 when Ashcroft v ACLU was decided (and protected online porn as free speech), Justice Scalia said "no, porn should not in any way be protected", and three other justices said whatever restrictions on it were in the law being adjudicated were acceptable as a way to protect children. SCOTUS's more recent decisions regarding hard age-verification in cases like Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton has held that strict age-verification laws are allowed.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)