137
WeatherMaster, Open Source, and the Future of Android; An Interview with Pranshul
(gardinerbryant.com)
this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
137 points (97.2% liked)
Technology
87550 readers
3264 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
According to the article, it's aimed to mimic Google's Weather app, so I would expect them to be very similar to Breezy.
The thing I'm looking for in a weather app right now is more reliable data. There was a pretty big storm last night that Open-Meteo completely missed.
Strongly agree. You can dress up the interface in all kinds of ways, but if the data being presented isn't good the rest of it doesn't matter.
For a long time the data from Weather Underground was the gold standard. Then IBM bought them, made the data an expensive subscription, and effectively killed it for non-corporate users.
Then Dark Sky broke new ground with hyper-local weather reporting. Which was great until Apple bought them, killed the Android app, and made it exclusively available to iPhone users.
The best source of free data that is still available in the US is still the National Weather Service. Unfortunately the quality has been degraded by massive budget cuts while whole sections of the API have been taken away.
Finding a high quality data source at a reasonable price has become almost impossible.
The fucked-up part is that there are various networks of croudsourced weather data, but I think most or all of them are proprietary, or at least centralized (which means enshittification could put consumer API access at risk).
We need a service that's peer-to-peer (or at least federated) and open-data-licensed. And also not affiliated with the National Weather Service because Trumpism puts even that one at risk.
I generally agree with you. I suspect the current weather station hardware is mostly designed to report in to its corporate owners, but that could probably be worked around. Building a decentralized network for collecting weather data should be possible.
The hard part is that turning the raw data into actual forecasts requires a lot of processing power. My first thought was that it could be done by a large distributed network, similar to what was done with the SETI at Home or the protein folding project. My second thought is that there might be enough processing power that way, but it would be too slow to be useful. There's a lot of lag time in that kind of decentralized arrangement. It would likely produce accurate forecast of what happened several hours ago. I'm not sure how to solve that part of the problem.
Hmm, I hadn't really thought about that; I was just thinking about stations reporting current conditions. But yeah, you're right that that's the important part. Is weather modeling software another one of those areas like CAD where the state-of-the-art is locked up in proprietary shit, or is it government/scientific enough that the software is public? If one were to start building a distributed weather prediction system, are we talking about refactoring existing software to be distributed or reading research papers and implementing algorithms from scratch?
My guess is that the ones that are really used are proprietary, but there are probably early versions of those that originated in academia that could be used.