this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2026
631 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

87716 readers
3100 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (11 children)

Sony still seems especially bad about this. They fought for decades to have the dominant physical media format, from Betamax, to Minidiscs, to Memory sticks. They would eventually win with Blurays by selling the PS3 at a huge loss and now they want to abandon physical media?

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (10 children)

The PS3 was released nearly 20 years ago and no media standard lasts forever. I think if you told them back then that the PS3 strategy would result in their media format being dominant for two decades, they wouldn't have said "ah well forget it, it's not worth it."

Bluray is starting to show it's age. The decision is really between creating a new physical media format or just going 100% digital. From a purely technological perspective digital makes a lot more sense.

The real problem is about trust and licenses. We don't trust a company when they announce plans to go 100% digital on the same week the break access to people's movies in their digital library. And they could set up a digital system that would allow you to sell your license to someone else, so you could give or sell your copy of the game to someone else. But we know that while that's technologically possible, they aren't going to do that.

So it's not a problem from a technology perspective, but it sucks for the consumer because of how they will implement the technology.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Bluray is starting to show it’s age

How?

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's always going to be capacity limitations, they're bulky compared to an SD card, they can get scratched and who know if some discs will eventually suffer from disc rot as happened with DVDs.

For better or for worse (mostly worse) most games require patches now, so you'll need an internet connection if you don't want to be stuck playing the buggy initial release of a game.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

games only require patching because developers cut corners thanks to internet connected consoles allowing for updates, before that we had literal decades of stable, playable games.

That has nothing to do with optical media, and everything to do with corporate stupidity and greed.

Bluray has enormous capacity, and compared to SD cards they literally cost pennies to print and manufacture.

the only disc rot I've heard about with regards to DVDs is a couple years where Warner Brothers specifically had an issue, which they ended up replacing all the discs for, granted it took them like 10 years to get enough pressure to get off their ass and do it, and it should have done it much sooner, so I'll concede that WB are cunts.. and I wager the reason they had rot is cause they tried to cheap out on the manufacturing and use something substandard.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)