this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
572 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

87515 readers
3071 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TL;DR: you now need to pay a $20/month "meta premium" subscription to use a 100% offline feature that runs on your own malware-ridden smartglasses.

If you don't subscribe, you can use the feature that is already included in the hardware that you already paid for 3 hours each month

The now-paywalled feature boosts the voice of the speaker in front of you, something that even low-end ANC earphones are doing now. 5 minutes of free usage per day is basically nothing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tae_glas@slrpnk.net 195 points 1 month ago (49 children)

good! hopefully this will discourage everyone who bought them from using them, so they just sit in a drawer somewhere or get recycled instead of spying on unwitting people, and meta will fail to make back the huge amounts of money they've invested in tech that most people don't want 😌

[–] andresil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (48 children)

It's funny, I would love to some have the novel tech they developed (HUD / display built into glasses since I'm wearing them anyways). The problem, as usual, is corps taking the piss with prices and profit then spying on you and everyone around you non-stop anyways....

I would 100% be open to some HUD glasses delivered with a FOSS OS that works completely offline and/or via your phone (but still offline). But that's seriously wishful thinking given our corporate and political overlords

[–] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (41 children)

I can't think of anything I would want to have pop up in my view. I have a phone to hand all day, and the notifies me of important things.

Can you think of anything that you actually want so see constantly or so immediately you can't pull a phone out of your pocket?

[–] Droechai@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Real time translation of speech or text, AR such as a guide overlay or wikipedia info box when looking at art, name tags and relationship data on people you interact with, especially if you are face blind or got like 20 different people in a treatment and support team

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Most of the uses for a HUD-IRL do not require personal ownership of the device. Like, the Louvre rented 3DSs to visitors for AR and guided visits for years. Guides and pop up info are appropriate on industrial settings, for personal hobbies it is overkill. Now, name tags and relationship data on people you interact with? weird and creepy. You mean like, for use by healthcare professionals? maybe, still no need to personally own one, and there are gigantic ethical issues to solve by having cameras constantly on during people's most vulnerable moments. For disability support, IDK, it might have uses, but it is still weird creepy and invasive, due to constant camera on and facial recognition active. You would have to trust 100% on the tech company behind it, and Meta is not exactly the most trustworthy corporation, by far.

[–] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, the art example and real time translation are already done with your phone. Having that in your face doesn't sound appealing or necessary.

For the face blind I can understand and be sympathetic, but for me I wouldn't want to have cameras on people constantly, or keep a database of people's information that could be leaked/lost.

[–] Droechai@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Managing a phone while using a wheelchair or other mobility assistance is not the easiest, so the HUD version would be an improvement. AR glasses or HUD glasses are imho some of the most promising hardware for accessability we got now so I really hope they (the glasses) will find a niche outside tech bro or stalking spaces

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

That's going to be a tough battle. The tech bro douchebags have a pretty tight grip on it at the moment.

[–] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah that's a good reason. How do you interact with them them though? Cause if it is hands or voice commands I don't think I see much benefit over having a phone mounted(things are already expensive and only getting more so).

If it is eye tracking for people who have issues interacting with a phone in other ways then, that would certainly be a huge leap forward for accessibility.

load more comments (38 replies)
load more comments (44 replies)
load more comments (44 replies)