Technology

87469 readers

3436 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

submitted 2 months ago by themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Also in that policy, however:

IN NO EVENT WILL SAMSUNG’S LIABILITY EXCEED THE AMOUNT PAID BY YOU FOR THE PRODUCT.

Shitty? Absolutely. Legally sound? Honestly, I don't think there's a chance in hell Samsung loses this... but is it worth the negative PR?

[+] kevinsky@feddit.nl 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I like Rossman but he is in the wrong here unfortunately.

In any sane country receipt price is what you get back if the issue cant be solved, price matching in reverse isnt a thing.

On top of that a lot of sellers will try to compensate you in some way, but they really dont have to.

Should samsung eat the cost of issuing a new disk for goodwill? Sure we think so but that is entirely up how much they value their brand name.

Except that in this case, the bad PR is manufactured by louis