this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
359 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

87649 readers
2789 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] baines@lemmy.cafe -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

yea no

you wanna ignore what is actual reality and play pretend go for it but i’m not interested in hearing about it

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They were being nice, but since you insist on persisting in your willfull ignorance: you're a fucking idiot who does not understand how the internet works nor how data centers are involved with it. Your straw man argument that 70% of the internet are bots is sourced by your ass, from whence you pulled it.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wow, you really are braindead. No one here is arguing against there being an enormous amount of bot traffic. Learn to interpret what you read.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

and yet when we’e not 5 replies deep your in the negatives, i think plenty of people get it even if you don’t

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're getting ratioed harder than me if you really wanna bring that up

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

because it’s the same 3 idiots this far down

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Nah, you're the only idiot left on the chain here. Enjoy your prize, you're special.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, you you and you. You were in the negatives by your fourth comment down. Literally one of my comments has been downvoted by anyone besides you. You're encroaching upon the border of delusional.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm actually telling the facts and you're the one being detached from reality, but normally people like you are "not interested in hearing about it" anyway, so I'm honestly not surprised you say that.

I'm done arguing with you for the same reason I don't debate climate change deniers.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

what facts?

there are literally multiple reports on how the majority of internet traffic is bots

what a strange hill to die on

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I never said anything about the relative proportion if internet traffic that is or isn't bots. Does your only argument require a severe misrepresentation of what anyone else is saying?

The fact is that the datacenters that have been rapidly accelerating the demise of the planet and its climate over the last 5-6 years are specifically AI datacenters. Getting rid of those, completely frivolous and unnecessary as they are, will go a long way to reducing the severity human-induced climate change.

Getting rid of the datacenters that make the internet possible would be negligible compared to that. But I'm just restating what I've already said at this point, because you're apparently either a troll or incapable of reading and understanding. Maybe both.

Taking away the internet from the billions of humans who use it just because it's flooded with bot traffic is a really stupid idea, when you could instead get rid of the datacenters that make the bots possible. The vast majority of compute operating these bots is happening at the bot-side of the internet, not at the datacenters running the internet. The actual amount of energy/compute used for that web traffic to travel from client to server is tiny compared to what's consumed at the bot farms.

What you're proposing is more akin to tearing up the highways in order to prevent drug trafficking. It doesn't solve the problem you're pretending to want to address, it's just a red herring that makes things worse for everyone else.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

no you just live in this make believe land from 5 years ago

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're the one living in make-believe land. You haven't even attempted to engage with a single thing I've said.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

because you specifically are a waste of time

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

Mirror, mirror