this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
68 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

87515 readers
2905 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

Indeed. The propaganda around these new AI models was that they were so dangerous that they would break the security of everything.

Turns out the biggest issues were a couple of user privlidge execution vulnerabilities? I guess that is testiment to the actual human effort that went into everything.

I'm heartened that there hasn't been any arbitrary code remote execution vulnerabilities that would have actually caused major problems.

We have known for a while that user security is only one layer and shouldn't be relied on 100%. Thats precisely why people run anything remotely dangerous in a VM, not just as an unprivilidged user. If you are running a service in docker, sure this is bad, but only catastrophic if the service also has a vulnerability allowing remote execution AND that machine has access to something else sensitive.