this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
104 points (98.1% liked)
Technology
87469 readers
3326 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If Micron wants a protected market, then I think that it's not unreasonable to also require that it come with an obligation to make enough memory to meet demand. Maybe they will in the long term, but they clearly are not doing so now and won't be for the next 18 months.
CMXT is not going to refrain from producing memory if Apple doesn't buy from them. Memory is a commodity. As long as there is someone in the world who wants to buy memory
and there is a lot of pent-up demand out there
CMXT is going to be able to sell their memory.
If the Chinese government wants to subsidize memory production, great. Right now, we don't have enough, so that's solving a problem we have using China's resources. If Micron starts to get in trouble down the line, if they can't produce at competitive prices, and we view it as a national security imperative to have domestic memory production, then look at protection.
Said the guy causing the AI crisis...