this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2026
712 points (97.2% liked)
Technology
87814 readers
3304 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
My thought process is that I set up the server on my home computer as the main base, and have that occasionally sync to my other devices such as phone and laptop, and sync back to it if I do any changes in those. The remote devices should have local database because my main computer will not always be online.
How feasible is that and how easy is that to set up?
Or should I just set up keepass instead since IIRC that's one of the ways it can be set up.
yeah, about that. none of the official bitwarden clients allow editing if the server is not accessible. they didn't want to have to deal with conflict resolution
sounds like a better idea. but synchronization wise, conflict resolution has to happen somewhere. like when you edit an entry on two devices, and later they try to sync both changes at once. Fortunately tye keepass format has a more comprehensive entry edit history than bitwarden, so clients can figure it out.
keepassxc on linux supports something called keeshare, check how is compatibility for that with your mobile keepass app. original keepass on windows supports some kind of automatic merging on saving and loading, maybe keepassxc does that too? if you end up using synthing, conflicts could occur at that layer, which is not hard but not so straightforward to handle, but keeshare is supposed to help with that I think.
Yeah, I feared that bitwarden might not like that with my scenario.
I've been putting off keepass ever since I found lastpass all those years ago and then learned about keepass. I guess I have to dedicate a weekend some time reading and setting everything up keepass between my Linux home base computer, android phone and grumble Windows work laptop.