this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2026
425 points (90.6% liked)

Technology

87814 readers
3457 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Finally got where I stand: why uncomfortable? It's just being hard to impose a sensible approach to it:

  • yes, llms can be used as a tool efficiently
  • no, killing the planet along the way is not an option, this has to ~~stop~~ be stopped
[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

llms can be used as a tool efficiently

Large swaths of people disagree with this, and it also causes legal uncertainty because the training data is copywritten or even patented.

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Yup, legal problem is there. Not being a lawyer, I see this as a complicated bunch of problems no one is going to solve to the benefit of everyone who actually made this possible (artists, programmers, social media users etc), which is sad (right now I don't even have the strength to swear)

To anyone who thinks llms are only good at spewing nonsense: well, my experience as well as that of many others says otherwise

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Oh the bright side: smaller local models are getting very good

On the bad side: large models are always a year ahead so everyone wants to keep using the datacenter ones.

[–] HieroProtagonist@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

this has to stop be stopped

How?

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 8 points 2 days ago

Local opposition to data centre builds seems to be most effective at the moment. People oppose it from across the political spectrum, and it's becoming a hot topic. Add your voice to the crowd.

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I have no good answer to that. My personal choice is ruin/kill any bastard who orders/approves building of data centers in their current state (read: doing damage to everything immediately around them and well beyond that), but I am physically far from anyone in that group