Technology

And I am going to repeat my real-politik question to you explicitly:

What's your grand non-punishment solution for members of society who actively harm other members of society? What to do with those who are non-compliant with "freedom requires and demands constraint"?

A society that simply represses or discards individuals because they engaged in destructive behaviour is not doing anything to in fact solve a problem.

I considered it to be implicit that society would do everything reasonable and appropriate to "solve" the problems of individuals engaged in destructive behavior, but experience has shown: the best efforts in these areas still fail to achieve 100% success. Certainly current societies all over the world (the U.S. especially) could try harder and do better, but 100% success has been historically elusive all over the world.

And a society that so simply and easily opts by fractioning itself just to allow more (blatantly artificial) freedom to its elements is not a society.

And should the entire human race be confined to a single society? Irrespective of our present predicament of cheap instant global communication I would submit: no, there is no one answer for how people should live in society. The one "basic human right" I would proffer to a universal collection of human societies is that: when someone wants to leave one society, they should be free to do so into any other society which is willing to accept them. No society should be under obligation to accept all applicants, but all societies should be required to let people leave whenever they want to, to wherever will willingly accept them.