this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
101 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

87685 readers
2699 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
101
US judge ruled AI-generated child sexual abuse material is protected by First Amendment. (reason.com)
submitted 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) by beep@piefed.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1368970/judge-ruled-ai-generated-child-sex-abuse-material-is-protected-by-first-amendment

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Evidence? You mean other than the extensive research, clinical tests, personal stories and confessions of offenders?

[โ€“] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 2 points 33 minutes ago* (last edited 29 minutes ago)

Anything's possible when you make shit up. You don't have research to support the claim that viewing any sort of pornographic material leads to behaviors depicted in that material, personal stories and confessions are not even close to the same thing as research and the fact that you bothered listing them together tells me that you're a fucking moron