this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
592 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

87685 readers
3815 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ButtDrugs@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Its better performance than existing non-gps systems - not better than GPS. For ships , being within 1nm after thousands of miles of travel is really well performing. Obvious the real play here is weaponry though, since GPS isnt reliable in warfare and on-board sensors can do the detail work of target identification once in an area, the hard part is a way for them to self navigate accurately over long distances without GPS.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The realer play is submarines. You don't get any satellite signal at all underwater. Before this it was only INS or dead reckoning.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I suspect submarines can also use bottom facing radar to track features on the sea floor. But tracking the gravity should be even better.

Radar doesn't work underwater. Sonar does, though most subs want to be stealthier than constantly shouting downwards.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)