this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2026
396 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

87550 readers
3227 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I wish PeerTube worked. For a while I tried just leaving in running on the theory that it might help out, but it didn't seem to do anything. Not sure if I'm doing it wrong?

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I'm running a private, unfederated node; it works. I watch TILVIDS whenever I can find something on there.

This is not an "if you build it, they will come" scenario,

There's no monetization, so there are almost no content creators.

Creators generally don't do it for free.

Good creators rely on income from the videos to produce higher-quality videos

Youtube: surfaces creators' videos pays creators hosts the videos handles CDN

Peertube: The creator pays to host the video (largely against their ISP's wishes) There's no surfacing There's no payments If you're lucky peertube doesn't need CDN.

Even if they go all patreon, they're still not getting that extra cash, surfacing, and free hosting that youtube does.

We need some kind of FOSS Patreon and to have Peertube do some kind of partner/recommendation engine.

[–] Poxlox@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'd rather money not be involved. There's plenty of people willing to release good content regardless. I'd actually say YouTubes monetization is what made it shitty

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

There’s plenty of people willing to release good content regardless.

But there really aren't. They would be all over the free platforms that have existed for years. But Peertube is nearly bereft of quality content, there are maybe a dozen regular creators that make anything interesting enough to 50% of the population to watch.

[–] ten8tp@reddthat.com 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not shilling for LMG, but something like Floatplane would make sense. You pay per creator for their extra content and ad free viewing and the cut goes in favor to the creator. Of course Floatplane has to also make money. They're not in it to serve you ads or use your data to make money. If that took off I could easily see people paying 3-5 creators monthly to watch their videos ad free with extras on one platform.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

Nebula has more and is cheaper. I had some interest in Floatplane. Last time I looked at it, Youtube was cheaper for my use case and them not listing creators up front is bad news.

[–] happydoors@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Same, dude. The power users will assume everyone has the time to assemble/learn the skill of setting it up. That being said, it’s on my list of things to figure out one day!

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago

yeah, one of the responses lower down made me realize why PeerTube is unlikely to be a success any time soon - it's not something the typical YouTube user has to deal with.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What did you want it to do?

Did you set up a node? Did you promote it & grow a user base? Federate?

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 4 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

I wanted it to not be dog slow, because every one I tried spent all its time buffering. I’m not really sure how the architecture of it works but it seemed to suggest some kind of p2p thing so thought that leaving the window open might seed it? But either it didn’t or just nobody was interested.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

you are not seeding by just leaving the window open on any peertube page. you are only seeding the specific video you have opened, if you have opened one, and probably not the complete video just the last segments you still have cached. this p2p sharing is mostly for when a certain video gets popular, to help with peek load, and for live streams. if the video was buffering for a long time it's probably because the server did not have enough upload bandwidth, and no other viewer had the video segments.

there is another load balancing system that peertube supports, they can clone videos fromneach other and help serving them: https://docs.joinpeertube.org/admin/following-instances#platforms-redundancy

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago

don't know why you got downvoted, this is 100% truth

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 hours ago

It never buffers for me, but I do have a full gig and super low latency

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 0 points 23 hours ago

all its time buffering.

Could be a zillion reasons for this. Need an actual instance to debug