this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
425 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

87450 readers
3658 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new Coddy Developer Survey found that four in five developers, 80%, say their use of AI has felt more like a dependence than an advantage.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 33 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

The only utility I've had with it is as a slightly more fancy document search. "Give me the syntax for [one line of code I want but can't remember]" or "Give me the syntax to do a c# style .select() call in [language I am less familiar with]"

And then I look at the docs and actually put the effort into understanding how the fuck things work.

Using it for anything more than that is a mistake. You still need to understand the context of what it is you're doing, you still need to think.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

You’ve never tried just giving it the task you did to see how it did?

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

I hate doing a lot of code review all at once, and AI vomits a lot of code. Hopefully the mistake is obviously big and up front, but all too often the mistake dwells in the details that I would likely be too tired to notice after a lot of plausible code.

With human code to review at least the volume is generally workable and when it's wrong, it tends to be more obviously wrong. A human that takes care of very detailed facets with care inspires trust in their thoroughness, but codegen looks that way without the thorough consideration.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 hour ago

Yes, and that's the easiest way to get garbage.

Asking for a single line of syntax and using my brain will always give me better results than checking out and gambling that the the output is based in reality.