this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
637 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

87598 readers
4129 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Only if you actually use that much. You almost certainly don’t.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

introducing: zram

toss 32 or 64gb at that and call it a day

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

YMMV.

Big ZRAM absolutely tanks performance for me because it "steals" space that could be used for normal memory.

But if its for squirrling away a bunch of idle processes when multitasking like crazy, yeah, it can be wonderful. Just depends.

[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If you're able to have swap, Zswap is supposed to be better.

Zram is intended for devices with no swap

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

...This appears to be amazing advice.

https://linuxblog.io/zswap-better-than-zram/

That's exactly what I was looking for. Thanks!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)