this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
228 points (80.3% liked)

memes

22450 readers
2928 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Captain_Baka@feddit.org 52 points 1 week ago (72 children)

Solar power + battery? Or hydropower? That way there won't be, well, nuclear waste at the end? You know, the kind of waste that's highly radioactive? The waste that doesn't have a plan to be safely stored away for tens of thousands of years?

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, but you need something with turbines to regulate power flow during off-peak. Hydropower can do that in some places, but not everywhere. That's the gap that nuclear should be aiming for (replace coal plants as minimum power regulator)

[–] Hellgruen@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Coal and nuclear re very bad for regulating power spikes because they are inflexible and can’t be turned on or off very fast. That’s why most country’s build gas as an intermediary power source right now

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

That's why it's for baseline power. No one is claiming it handles spikes. We have solutions for that though. Solar and wind also obviously don't handle spikes. Many types of batteries do, and they don't care where the power came from.

Rotational energy is actually a pretty good battery, which has no conversion cost with nuclear, since rotational energy is what it produces with the turbine. You spin your flywheel up, and you drain power from it as you need it. Chemical batteries also work, with the conversation cost that all sources pay equally.

load more comments (70 replies)