Funny how »open is dangerous« only became the dominant narrative once Chinese models caught up: If your competitive moat depends on governments blocking free alternatives instead of building better products, maybe your moat isn’t technology at all.
this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2026
36 points (90.9% liked)
Technology
87598 readers
3967 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
This is so blatantly obvious, for anyone paying attencion, that just goes to show how ignorant/naive most people are
Ever since facts have been replaced by ideologies, the obvious has increasingly become a mystery.
I don't about your business, but we've had LOT of conversations about how much we trust these models. Not just about data egress, but on what they are trained to do/not to do - Chinese or not.
Absolutely. Trust isn’t binary, and it isn’t unique to Chinese models either. Every (frontier) model reflects the incentives, values and constraints of whoever built it. That’s exactly why competition matters.
Just delete it all.