this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
1247 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

87598 readers
3730 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Eh_I@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago

Cant wait to see their reaction when AI replaces them

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago
[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This has been the case ever since things that seem great, like google cloud computing...and your little project just bankrupted you because you left a tap open over the weekend.

[–] Kimika@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I look at AI usage at work as basically taking on a bad but salvageable employee. For every use case, it needs a manager overseeing all their work and adapting to their strengths and weaknesses while also considering cost. It's a deployment problem created by over promising.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago

The salvageable employee will actually learn.

The AI doesn't learn.

They're only equivalent for the kind of manager who thinks investing in people is a waste of money.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] amberlantern33542@lemmy.1095.me 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@FoxtrotDeltaTango's post glosses over something: the token bill is only 60% of the real cost. Infrastructure to handle latency (caching, batching), human review loops for quality, and retraining pipelines when models drift add another 40-50%. A team that thought they'd replace two engineers with an API often ends up hiring a prompt engineer + ML ops person instead. The margin math gets much uglier when you add those in. Broke down the full cost-of-ownership (tokens + ops + people) here https://cxgo.ai/l/IjOzask — helps separate real savings from accounting fiction.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grte@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago

We are ruled by privileged idiots.

[–] the_armchair_potato@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can't wait for this AI shit to crash and burn itself to dust!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 16 points 1 month ago

May they get utterly Forded

[–] SalmonTractor@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You'd think they would have learned that from the cloud or any SaaS provider multiple times over already.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] db2@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

At this rate the leopards are going to have to start going on a restricted diet. Maybe the panthers are hungry too though.

I mean exactly what you think I mean.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That makes it pretty clear that most executives are the worst possible people to run a company. Well, that’s just how it is when ruthlessness and greed are the only criteria used to select top executives.

But hey, even if they were to lose their jobs because they’re burning through so much money, things will go on as usual: Anyone who’s ever held a top management position will always be hired for the same role somewhere else, because competence is definitely not the deciding factor here. Never was, never will be.

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

On the same token, it’s important ...

We see what you did there.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›