this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2026
984 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

87814 readers
3457 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 35 points 2 days ago

Firefox users right now:

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago

Google's going to lengths and bounds to make people leave it.

[–] THX1138@lemmy.ml 283 points 3 days ago (33 children)
load more comments (33 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 216 points 3 days ago (3 children)
[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 32 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Just a crying shame Mozilla has turned into a commercial nightmare making them relatively poor custodians of the only free choice we have left.

Mozilla needs to die so Firefox can live.

The income stream from Firefox is plenty for a highly technical, deeply competent, widely dispersed team could work full time on the product using something like OpenCollective.

Instead what we get is prime SF real estate offices, “competitive” SF salaries and a commercial organisation that seeks weird and increasingly desperate income streams to justify looking like “real company”.

I want an actual non-profit governing Firefox.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 114 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

This is gonna be so bad because now there is only uBlock origin lite and "uBlock", if you couln't guess: the 2nd one is a scam that google never tried to remove(it's been up for some years IIRC) and i am sure that everyone will try to install this scam because they can't find the original uBlock origin (and everyone just refers to uBlock origin as uBlock which makes it worse)

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 68 points 3 days ago (2 children)

the 2nd one is a scam that google never tried to remove

It's a little more complicated. uBlock was the original name, gorhil handed it off when he felt the maintenance burden became too high. Then he forked it to make his own uBlock Origin version.

At some point later uBlock was bought up by the AdBlock people, who in turn were later bought by the AdBlock Plus people.

So it's not a scam exactly, more like an inbred sideline of the royal family.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 days ago

It’s a scam because it specifically goes out of its way to not block an ad, as long as that ad pays a bribe to them. It should be called uAd.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

ublock origin lite, the natural replacement but not automatically enabled by google or microsoft. you have to go get it. https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home

an alternative is adguard's browser extension. it is free to use and open source (gpl). https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardBrowserExtension#installation

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

No you get Firefox

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 70 points 3 days ago (6 children)

company which makes most of it's revenue from advertising fucks with their browser's ability to remove ads. Go figure!

load more comments (6 replies)

And i removed Chrome from my devices

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 180 points 3 days ago (17 children)

Anyone that uses Chrome doesn't know what a clean non ad infested website looks like so they won't notice the difference.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 3 days ago (15 children)

Every time I do IT work, I ask to install Firefox

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] isekaihero@ani.social 51 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I think I'll be switching to librewolf at home. It can install mozilla extensions and comes with ublock origin baked in. Pulling a stunt like this is just going to drive people away from the Chrome environment. Corpos can't help but shoot themselves in the foot.

[–] MuskyLime@lemmy.zip 39 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Most people I know simply don't care. They will use it because it's convenient and they don't care about the privacy dangers. I can't comprehend it myself though. Drives me up the wall.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They will use it because it's convenient

Using web without ublock is amongst the most inconvenient things I've experienced

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 119 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Given how long ago this was announced, anybody still using Chrome doesn't care.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 days ago (5 children)

When will people switch away from Chrome to other browsers? I get it, Chrome sets the standards and it's hard to switch away from them, but it's necessary to ensure the survival of the Internet.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They wouldn’t set the standard anymore if nobody used them.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The W3 spec is dominated by Google's submissions afaik.

[–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

Because everyone uses them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] danielfm123@lemmy.zip 44 points 3 days ago (13 children)

Install Firefox with https://adnauseam.io/, it's basically ublock origin but internally clicks on every add destroying your adds profile and damaging economics of adds and conversion.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] UnLocoPoco@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Edge will soon follow. They announced it. Polly will switch to helium or brave

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Brave is kinda shady with their whole cryptocurrency thing, Helium seems fine but it’s still based on Chromium. I’ve been recommending people check out Librewolf

[–] hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Simple Firefox is perfectly fine.

Ungoogled Chromium is my standby for the instances when a Blink browser is needed, though it's not entirely simple to set up.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kamen@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

First time hearing of Helium, thanks for mentioning. Sounds interesting, will be keeping an eye on it.

[–] SquareScarletCougar@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

firefox became bloated so switched to chrome because faster/better. back to firefox last year. too old to keep fighting ads. thinking off button will be next. yeah addons mostly work

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 10 points 2 days ago (6 children)

What's "bloated" about Firefox?

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Distant past. Few of us recall.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] anewfox@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago (5 children)

nobody ever seems to detail what kinda bloat they mean when they say that, i don't think they actually thought about it that deeply. nobody complains about anything specific like XUL support, for example.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I switched to Chrome back then because it ran tabs in separate processes. A tab crashing in Firefox would take the whole browser down.

The final straw for me was the plugins. Flash, Java, Acrobat, etc. Chrome kept them up to date for you. Firefox made you just through hoops, which eventually lead to a rogue site injecting crap onto my machine which took me a day to clean up. Plugins are pretty much dead now, but back then you needed them for half the web to work.

Chrome really was a great browser back then (and MS were still in the "what's wrong with Internet Explorer?" era), and it's a shame that they're now working so hard to fuck it up again.

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 3 points 2 days ago

Chrome did a bunch of things absolutely wonderfully in the beginning. Fast JavaScript engine, removed title bar (tabs on top), simple settings page, sandboxed tabs, and they made some of the functionality of the most popular Firefox extensions the default (such as the downloads bar, instead of a separate window).

It was basically a pre-modded Firefox, but supercharged. Now it's corporate slop.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago

I still rock NoScript. It helps avoid drive-bys and other silliness. It does take patience though so I get why not many like it.

[–] BigTurkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 63 points 3 days ago (12 children)
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 52 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

A thin layer of chromium on the surface of a metal to make it shiny and protect from corrosion.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 21 points 3 days ago

so it ~~begins~~ continues...

load more comments
view more: next ›