1201
Yes feedback from humans can be incoherent.
this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
1201 points (98.8% liked)
memes
22472 readers
3785 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
In aggregate
Hahaha
👍
.
All encyclopedias are bad sources. Be they wiki or not. They are not in depth enough on a topic to be useful in a paper.
load more comments
(1 replies)
This honestly shouldn't be surprising. Tech is often untrusted at first.
This caused the dot com bust and likely will fuel the AI bubble. New cool tech comes out and actually does cool stuff, people hate it, distrust it, don't want to use it, meanwhile others think it's the wave of the future and throw all their money at it.
And there's one big problem with that, the last thing specifically.. they throw their money at something new before a market is ready to trust and adopt it, and they do so in an unsustainable way. Unsustainable investments cause bubbles. This is money that can't keep getting pumped into the tech, money that a lot of startups depend on.
People didn't think you'd ever spend money on weird websites, trust credit cards to be entered online. So many groundbreaking ideas busted in the dot com bubble because they came too soon, not because they were bad ideas. WebVan was online groceries! Groundbreaking idea that was literally 30 years ahead of its time, and now they failed, but who does what they tried to do? Amazon, yes the little online marketplace for books Amazon, the quaint little site where you can buy books over http.
The market needed credit card safety measures, needed PayPal, stripe, fraud detection and management, needed new technologies to build consumer trust. Eventually, we started using the internet to buy shit and it worked out.
Wikipedia used to be untrusted. Anyone can put anything there! Now teachers rather see wikipedia than AI bullshit. Same phenomenon really. It'll take a while before the market adopts the tech and consumers trust it. Eventually they will, but not yet.
load more comments
(1 replies)
if you are writing essays, or papers, yea you will hear this.
Breitbart is still around?
as if a book written by any random dude would be any better source
it's really difficult to find good sources. books? written by random dude. wikipedia? written by random dudes. school books? written by a government that wants you to be a docile worker. where do you get information from?
books are valid sources, if your looking at books written by opinions and on fiction thats on you. there are plenty of non-fiction books out there with valid research sources.