this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026
391 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

87649 readers
3369 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

The poor and powerless who will be forced to use this shit in every job, that's who.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Let me guess, poor people?

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I said this was exactly what was going to happen years ago. Companies and developers were going to use AI as a barrier between themselves and being sued because they won’t be held responsible for what their creation says.

[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

That's... That's exactly the opposite of what the article says 😭 The article is literally about how the guy deploying the model is liable for the harm it causes, as would be the corpo's. It's so weird when people comment without reading 😂

[–] UnLocoPoco@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Kintarian@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If I turn on auto pilot in my car and hit a pedestrian, guess who gets charged? If you create an agent that causes harm, you are responsible.

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

That same autopilot that is advertised as 1000% safer than any human driver? Guess who should be charged

[–] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I actually don’t know the answer to your question. I’m going to assume you would get charged, even though it should be the manufacturer that is charged.

[–] Kintarian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I would get charged for failure to maintain control of my vehicle and reckless driving and assault with a deadly weapon. Rich corporations don’t face consequences.

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

The person who inputs it is responsible for the outputs.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

That hardware doesn't belong to anybody??

Guess it's mine now >:D

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

The company offering the AI is.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hottest take: Since it was trained on the output of society, then society itself should pay for AI mistakes.

[–] Godofdirt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

AI should just die

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 2 weeks ago

Depends. External provider? It's the provider's fault. Local? It's the user. Not exactly rocket science.

The owners or company should be. an AI isn't even a person or consious the creators created the "evil" it did too. but they are rich so no one ig lol.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›