this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
365 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

87598 readers
3700 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I want 5 more years. That’s all.

I really hate what this industry has become.

[–] niftyharbor57599@lemmy.1095.me 0 points 2 months ago

@sanitation, one thing that gets underweighted in the 'early retirement' conversation is that human capital — basically the present value of future earnings — is itself a bond-like asset on most people's balance sheets. Tech workers walking away in their 50s are removing a large, relatively stable income stream earlier than planned, which changes the math on how much equity risk the financial portfolio should carry. Counterintuitively, that might argue for less equity exposure initially, not more. We wrote up the human-capital-to-portfolio handoff framework at https://cxgo.ai/l/JSt4tMF if it's relevant to where the thread is going. Research content only, not financial advice. Investing involves risk.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think the truth is more like "Older tech workers can no longer compete in an ageist world where youth and shininess rule".

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›