1075
Reddit stock tumbles the most on record as lack of new AI deals, US daily users metric disappoints
(finance.yahoo.com)
this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2026
1075 points (99.3% liked)
Technology
87550 readers
3377 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
"What's behind the move: The user discussion platform company's latest earnings report did not announce any new artificial intelligence data licensing agreements, disappointing investors who were expecting more revenue opportunities from AI partnerships.
Revenue of $804.9 million beat estimates of $731.8 million. However, US daily active users came in at 53.2 million, just shy of expectations of 54 million. The company's total daily active users grew by 18% to 130.3 million versus estimates of 130.07 million. "
Lmao. 53.2 vs 54, and the headline says that's why it's tumbling? Nah, it's gotta be just the AI. I bet most of the reddit investors were also invested in AI stock and wanted to use reddit to pump the others. Hilarious. The entire value of Reddit is human UGC.
1.8 million daily US users is significant...
It's not the main reason, which is why it was the second one listed. But it's still substantial.
And the reddit investors wanted AI deals, because that's about the only way to monetize Reddit.
If an AI company says they'll pay money for data Reddit has, that would make Reddits stock price go up.
Like, what are you even talking about?
First off, that's a difference of 0.8M, not 1.8M. So you've got that significance overestimated by more than 100%.
The stock dropped 22%, which a metric missed by 1.48% does not at all explain. I don't think it's substantial at all. They essentially hit the target. Meanwhile revenue was $70M more than expected, which would be the main value of users anyways (aside from data selling, but then of course we get into the other factor...) So how does that possibly equate to 22% price drop? It could only be because the AI partnerships were essentially the only concern. Hence why I said the only value was human UGC. Because AI corps aren't willing to pay for that UGC, Reddits value plummets.
I'm talking about the annoying trend of stock market articles to try to explain things that hardly make sense. It's trying to make it sound like reddit's user count is in trouble when it's clearly not.